Postgraduate course study is a way to improve the quality of postgraduate education. Taking course study evaluation as the starting point, understand the factors that affect postgraduate course study evaluation, and explore effective ways to improve the effect of postgraduate course study. In the context of the expansion of full-time postgraduate enrollment, in order to more effectively promote the study of postgraduate courses, this article attempts to take full-time postgraduates from three universities in the southwest region as the survey object, and through the systematic literature review of factors affecting course evaluation at home and abroad , And combined with the actual situation of domestic higher education, select three dimensions that affect the evaluation of postgraduate courses as research indicators, analyze the factors that affect the evaluation of full-time postgraduate courses, construct a corresponding structural equation model based on the evaluation indicators, and analyze the weight of each influencing factor And make relevant suggestions. The research results show that learning gain is the most significant factor influencing the evaluation of full-time postgraduates' courses; different postgraduate grades believe that the importance of each dimension in the classroom is different; classroom atmosphere is also particularly important in postgraduate course learning.
Published in | Science Innovation (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.si.20210903.11 |
Page(s) | 81-85 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Postgraduates, Course Evaluation, Influencing Factors, Structural Equation Model
[1] | 马燕,张莉莉,邓丽姣.研究生导师指导满意度影响因素实证研究——基于SEM模型[J].重庆师范大学学报(社会科学版),2020(03):68-76. |
[2] | 马燕,胡慧丽,韩淑珍,陈星.研究生科研创新能力的影响因素分析——基于SEM的实证研究[J].现代教育管理,2019(09):108-112. |
[3] | 顾艳丽. 学术型硕士研究生的专业课程认同研究[D].西南大学,2019. |
[4] | 林丽萍.“因材施教”在研究生培养实践中的应用[J].江苏科技信息,2018,35(25):64-66. |
[5] | 陈容,沈丽琴.基于结构方程模型的大学生网络获取性相关信息行为影响因素分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2020,36(11):1467-1474. |
[6] | 杜宝贵,唐纪航.高校学生科研诚信行为影响因素研究——基于结构方程模型的分析[J].辽宁工业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,22(06):90-96. |
[7] | 王岳喜.论高校课程思政评价体系的构建[J].思想理论教育导刊,2020(10):125-130 |
[8] | 徐燕敏,刘若泳.全日制教育硕士专业学位研究生课程评价因素探究——以A大学全日制教育硕士为例[J].黑龙江教育(高教研究与评估),2011(12):66-68. |
[9] | 付晨玉,徐慧玲.面向智能时代的经济金融拔尖创新人才培养模式探索——以湖北经济学院财经高等研究院为例[J].湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版),2020,17(11):118-120. |
[10] | 李锐,左精力,李微.场地竖向设计多元化课程考核评价体系构建[J].教育教学论坛,2020(46):198-199. |
[11] | 刘若泳,徐燕敏.影响硕士研究生课程评价因素探究——以A大学教育学院为例[J].长春工业大学学报(高教研究版),2011,32(02):51-53. |
[12] | 王敏.浅谈大学课程评价的影响因素[J].科技信息(学术研究),2006(11):276-277. |
[13] | 朱孟青.MOOC背景下在线开放课程建设探究[J].决策探索(下),2020(11):36-37. |
[14] | 方昕.基于OBE理念的课程教学目标达成评价分析[J].微型电脑应用,2020,36(07):20-23. |
[15] | 龙冠丞.“双一流”战略下地方高校“一流学科”建设的困境与突破[J].教书育人(高教论坛),2020(33):10-13. |
APA Style
Hu Chenyue, Hong Lan, Liu Chunyan. (2021). Study on the Evaluation Factors of Full-time Postgraduate Course Study——Empirical Research Based on SEM. Science Innovation, 9(3), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20210903.11
ACS Style
Hu Chenyue; Hong Lan; Liu Chunyan. Study on the Evaluation Factors of Full-time Postgraduate Course Study——Empirical Research Based on SEM. Sci. Innov. 2021, 9(3), 81-85. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20210903.11
AMA Style
Hu Chenyue, Hong Lan, Liu Chunyan. Study on the Evaluation Factors of Full-time Postgraduate Course Study——Empirical Research Based on SEM. Sci Innov. 2021;9(3):81-85. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20210903.11
@article{10.11648/j.si.20210903.11, author = {Hu Chenyue and Hong Lan and Liu Chunyan}, title = {Study on the Evaluation Factors of Full-time Postgraduate Course Study——Empirical Research Based on SEM}, journal = {Science Innovation}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, pages = {81-85}, doi = {10.11648/j.si.20210903.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20210903.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20210903.11}, abstract = {Postgraduate course study is a way to improve the quality of postgraduate education. Taking course study evaluation as the starting point, understand the factors that affect postgraduate course study evaluation, and explore effective ways to improve the effect of postgraduate course study. In the context of the expansion of full-time postgraduate enrollment, in order to more effectively promote the study of postgraduate courses, this article attempts to take full-time postgraduates from three universities in the southwest region as the survey object, and through the systematic literature review of factors affecting course evaluation at home and abroad , And combined with the actual situation of domestic higher education, select three dimensions that affect the evaluation of postgraduate courses as research indicators, analyze the factors that affect the evaluation of full-time postgraduate courses, construct a corresponding structural equation model based on the evaluation indicators, and analyze the weight of each influencing factor And make relevant suggestions. The research results show that learning gain is the most significant factor influencing the evaluation of full-time postgraduates' courses; different postgraduate grades believe that the importance of each dimension in the classroom is different; classroom atmosphere is also particularly important in postgraduate course learning.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Study on the Evaluation Factors of Full-time Postgraduate Course Study——Empirical Research Based on SEM AU - Hu Chenyue AU - Hong Lan AU - Liu Chunyan Y1 - 2021/05/24 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20210903.11 DO - 10.11648/j.si.20210903.11 T2 - Science Innovation JF - Science Innovation JO - Science Innovation SP - 81 EP - 85 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20210903.11 AB - Postgraduate course study is a way to improve the quality of postgraduate education. Taking course study evaluation as the starting point, understand the factors that affect postgraduate course study evaluation, and explore effective ways to improve the effect of postgraduate course study. In the context of the expansion of full-time postgraduate enrollment, in order to more effectively promote the study of postgraduate courses, this article attempts to take full-time postgraduates from three universities in the southwest region as the survey object, and through the systematic literature review of factors affecting course evaluation at home and abroad , And combined with the actual situation of domestic higher education, select three dimensions that affect the evaluation of postgraduate courses as research indicators, analyze the factors that affect the evaluation of full-time postgraduate courses, construct a corresponding structural equation model based on the evaluation indicators, and analyze the weight of each influencing factor And make relevant suggestions. The research results show that learning gain is the most significant factor influencing the evaluation of full-time postgraduates' courses; different postgraduate grades believe that the importance of each dimension in the classroom is different; classroom atmosphere is also particularly important in postgraduate course learning. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -